Software Engineering

Forced Ranking: How to Learn and Improve Upon Them

Forced ranking systems, also known as forced distribution, have been used by many organizations as a way to evaluate employee performance. However, this system has a negative impact on employees and can be detrimental to their motivation, morale, and productivity.
Published on
March 2024

Forced ranking systems, also known as forced distribution or rank-and-yank systems, have been used by many organizations as a way to evaluate employee performance.

This system requires managers to rank their employees from top to bottom performers and then reward or punish them accordingly.

However, this system has a negative impact on employees and can be detrimental to their motivation, morale, and productivity.

The Drawbacks of Forced Ranking

Unfair Comparison and Negative Consequences

Forced ranking systems are based on the assumption that there is a fixed number of high performers, average performers, and low performers in any given team. However, this is not always the case, and many employees can fall into the category of average performers, even though they are doing a great job.

Forced ranking systems can be unfair to employees because they create an artificial competition where employees are pitted against each other.

This can lead to negative consequences such as resentment, lack of collaboration, and even sabotage among team members.

Inconsistent and Biased Evaluations

Forced ranking systems are usually dependent on one manager's subjective opinion and are often conducted once a year. This can lead to inconsistent and biased evaluations that do not accurately reflect the employee's performance throughout the year.

Managers may have (un)conscious personal biases, preferences, or prejudices that can influence their ranking decisions, and employees may be penalized for factors that are beyond their control.

Lack of Development and Growth Opportunities

Forced ranking systems focus on identifying and rewarding the top performers, while ignoring the rest of the employees who may be doing a good job but not at the same level as the top performers.

This can create a demotivating environment where employees feel undervalued, unappreciated, and stuck in their current role.

Moreover, forced ranking systems do not provide meaningful feedback or development opportunities for employees to improve their performance and skills.

As an example, imagine that you are a customer service representative working for a company that uses a forced ranking system. You have been working for the company for two years, and you have received positive feedback from your customers and colleagues.

However, you have not been ranked as a top performer because your numbers are not as high as those of your colleagues who are in the top ranking.

You feel stuck in your current role, and you are not sure how to improve your performance in a system that does not provide development opportunities or feedback.

Alternatives to Forced Ranking

So, what can companies do to ensure that their performance evaluation systems are fair, accurate, and promote employee growth and development?

One alternative to forced ranking is a system that focuses on continuous feedback and coaching. This approach involves regular check-ins between managers and employees throughout the year to discuss performance, set goals, and offer support and guidance.

With this type of system, managers can identify areas for improvement and offer coaching and resources to help employees grow and develop in their roles. This ongoing feedback also allows employees to address issues in real-time, rather than waiting until the end of the year for a formal evaluation.

Moreover, it allows for a more personalized approach to performance evaluation, taking into account the unique strengths and challenges of each employee.

Ditch the Rankings

Forced ranking systems have a negative impact on employees and can be detrimental to their motivation. These systems create an artificial competition among employees, lead to inconsistent and biased evaluations, and deprive employees of meaningful feedback and development opportunities.

Instead, a continuous feedback and coaching approach, such as WorkStory, offers a more comprehensive and supportive way to evaluate employee performance, rather than pitting employees against each other in a forced ranking system.

By fostering a culture of growth and development, companies can create a more engaged and motivated workforce, leading to better business outcomes for all.

Weekly newsletter
Join hundreds of HR and team leads—receive our very best resources in your inbox every week.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Whenever you’re ready, here are 4 ways WorkStory can help you:

  1. The WorkStory Platform: Our all-in-one performance management solution. WorkStory makes it easy to gather continuous feedback, run 360 reviews, and track team progress—all in one place. Perfect for teams looking to move beyond traditional performance reviews.
  2. The Performance Review Builder Tool: Create customized performance reviews that fit your organization’s unique needs. Tailor the reviews to each role, streamline the review process, and focus on growth-oriented feedback.
  3. Performance Review Templates: Access a library of pre-built, best-in-class performance review templates that are ready to use. Whether you need templates for leadership, team members, or cross-functional roles, we’ve got you covered.
  4. HR Document Templates: From onboarding checklists to change management guides, our HR templates are designed to save time and ensure consistency across your organization. Simply download, customize, and implement.
Latest Posts
Newsletter

How to Hold Managers Accountable for Performance Reviews

The truth is, performance reviews don’t fail because of employees—they fail because managers aren’t being held accountable for their role in the process. Here’s why manager accountability matters and how you can make it a priority in your organization.
Read post
Newsletter

Three Common Performance Review Pitfalls—and How to Avoid Them

As we head into the end-of-year review season, it’s a good time to evaluate how you’re conducting performance reviews. A well-executed review process can inspire and set a clear path for growth. But a few common pitfalls can turn reviews into an ineffective or even dreaded experience for employees.
Read post
Newsletter

5 Signs Your Team Is Quiet Quitting (And How to Fix It)

As a leader, one of the most challenging things to spot is when your team members have mentally checked out but are still physically present. This phenomenon is called quiet quitting—where employees do the bare minimum without showing the engagement they once had.
Read post